Duplicate records
~12% duplicate account rate created outreach collisions and reporting distortion.
Home / Case Studies / Improving CRM Data Quality
Case StudyA scaling B2B SaaS team had low trust in CRM data. Darwin implemented duplicate controls, enrichment pipelines, and quality monitoring to restore operational confidence.
As volume grew, data hygiene standards lagged behind. Different teams edited records with inconsistent rules, enrichment happened ad-hoc, and key reporting dimensions became unreliable.
~12% duplicate account rate created outreach collisions and reporting distortion.
~40% of records were missing fields needed for routing/scoring logic.
Data decayed without continuous enrichment or quality monitoring.
Reduced from ~12% to under 2% with ongoing controls.
Improved from ~60% to ~95% for routing/scoring-critical fields.
Sales and RevOps returned to shared reporting as the operational source of truth.
We optimized for consistency and maintainability over maximum enrichment depth in sprint one. Advanced enrichment breadth was phased after core data integrity was restored.
Related reading: CRM data quality diagnostics · Infrastructure Audit · GTM engineering pricing
Most teams see clear baseline improvements in the first sprint once duplicate logic, required fields, and enrichment pipelines are stabilized.
Yes. In most cases, quality can improve significantly through better validation, pipeline design, and monitoring on your current stack.
Get an Infrastructure Audit and identify the highest-impact data fixes first.